<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.anthropology.paleo Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo</link>
  <description>Evolution of man and other primates.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/53a6c597613c02f8?show_docid=53a6c597613c02f8</link>
  <description>
  On Feb 26, 10:45 am, &amp;quot;rmacfarl&amp;quot; &amp;lt;rmacf...@alphalink.com.au&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; One post you&#39;re whingeing that I&#39;m &amp;quot;catty&amp;quot;, next your passing out &lt;br&gt; abuse with every breath. &lt;br&gt; My &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; is that you&#39;ve concocted some half-baked &lt;br&gt; ground-breaking hypothesis on the basis of - what? A photo you &lt;br&gt; saw New Scientist? This marks you as a person not to be relied
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/53a6c597613c02f8?show_docid=53a6c597613c02f8</guid>
  <author>
  rmacf...@alphalink.com.au
  (rmacfarl)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:10:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/38a03252f6ebbd6f?show_docid=38a03252f6ebbd6f</link>
  <description>
  Look moron, I realise that you can&#39;t read, but I did not formulate a &lt;br&gt; new hypothesis about human evolution. &lt;br&gt; If you can&#39;t read, I can recommend a good elementary school for you to &lt;br&gt; attend. &lt;br&gt; Peter Zohrab
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/38a03252f6ebbd6f?show_docid=38a03252f6ebbd6f</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:05:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/b569a9b7f3442c78?show_docid=b569a9b7f3442c78</link>
  <description>
  Look moron, if you&#39;re too gutless to state your own name, at least &lt;br&gt; stop calling me &amp;quot;Pete&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Peter Zohrab
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/b569a9b7f3442c78?show_docid=b569a9b7f3442c78</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:02:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/81baaa7750cee631?show_docid=81baaa7750cee631</link>
  <description>
  If you weren&#39;t such a moron, you would have the guts to explain what &lt;br&gt; evidence you have that what I suggested is incorrect. &lt;br&gt; Peter Zohrab
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/81baaa7750cee631?show_docid=81baaa7750cee631</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:01:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/febb24de5ebf887b?show_docid=febb24de5ebf887b</link>
  <description>
  Moron! &lt;br&gt; Are you such a thickshit that you haven&#39;t got anything sensible to &lt;br&gt; say? Obviously, you watch cartoons, so maybe I should have spoken in &lt;br&gt; baby-talk, so that you would have understood. &lt;br&gt; Peter Zohrab
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/febb24de5ebf887b?show_docid=febb24de5ebf887b</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:53:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Bonobos opt to share their food</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/03541c605ba4b512/b21ba174a882d8ba?show_docid=b21ba174a882d8ba</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8548478.stm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; 8 March 2010 &lt;br&gt; One of our closest primate relatives, the bonobo, has been shown to &lt;br&gt; voluntarily share food, scientists report. &lt;br&gt; This sort of generous behaviour was previously thought by some to be &lt;br&gt; an exclusively human trait. &lt;br&gt; But a team has carried out an experiment that revealed that bonobos
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/03541c605ba4b512/b21ba174a882d8ba?show_docid=b21ba174a882d8ba</guid>
  <author>
  trarve...@hotmmoveail.com
  (RichTravsky)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:07:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/1e825af685410e0e?show_docid=1e825af685410e0e</link>
  <description>
  On Feb 27, 2:37 am, mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper) &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Thank you for the links (one of which I knew about), but they don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; disprove my suggestion that education of the young is just as special &lt;br&gt; about (if not unique to) humans as language and tool-use. Probably, &lt;br&gt; they are all (i.e. language, tool use and education) non-unique but
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/1e825af685410e0e?show_docid=1e825af685410e0e</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:48:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/86d9501d964ddbcf?show_docid=86d9501d964ddbcf</link>
  <description>
  On Feb 26, 5:51 am, Harlan Messinger &lt;br&gt; Not at all. The fact that scientists *think* that their purpose is &lt;br&gt; the conception and testing of more new ideas does not prevent them &lt;br&gt; from being less open to radically new ideas than to ideas which are &lt;br&gt; closer to their accustomed ways of thinking.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/86d9501d964ddbcf?show_docid=86d9501d964ddbcf</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:36:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/8683246db8a53315?show_docid=8683246db8a53315</link>
  <description>
  The relevance to sci.lang is that some other people have assumed that &lt;br&gt; the symbols are likely to be linguistic in nature. I do not assume &lt;br&gt; that my proposal is necessarily correct, so I posted to sci.lang in &lt;br&gt; order for there to be discussion (or at least thought) as to whether &lt;br&gt; they are linguistic, arithmetical, or some other kind of symbol.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/8683246db8a53315?show_docid=8683246db8a53315</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:33:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Messages From the Stone Age (New Scientist 20.02.2010)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/ae2d0bf44c77a65d?show_docid=ae2d0bf44c77a65d</link>
  <description>
  On Feb 25, 1:59 pm, &amp;quot;porky_pig...@my-deja.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;porky_pig...@my- &lt;br&gt; It is hard to think of a more puerile suggestion than this one about &lt;br&gt; Maxwell&#39;s equations. If prehistoric children were being taught &lt;br&gt; mathematics in a cave, they would not be taught advanced mathmatics &lt;br&gt; that had not been invented/discovered yet. The combination of using
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0e27de7ffbe6c0db/ae2d0bf44c77a65d?show_docid=ae2d0bf44c77a65d</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@zohrab.name
  (peter zohrab)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:24:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>A N T R O P O L O G Y - DENIED THE TRUE OF THE BIBLE. MODERN ANTROPOLOGISTS ARE SOCIALISTS</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/dbdb39dfdbcc3765/e0e40d19cc31dc74?show_docid=e0e40d19cc31dc74</link>
  <description>
  MODERN ANTROPOLOGY REJECT THE BIBLE EVIDENCE : &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://belial-666.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/dbdb39dfdbcc3765/e0e40d19cc31dc74?show_docid=e0e40d19cc31dc74</guid>
  <author>
  col...@terra.com.co
  (VENDETTA)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:09:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ED CONRAD HUNG IN EFFIGY -- But the Cave Girls LOVED Him ,</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/1b654762fefde559/894f67ab8c60af91?show_docid=894f67ab8c60af91</link>
  <description>
  &amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; ED CONRAD&#39;S PETRIFIED PEE-PEE &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.edconrad.com/pics/PetrifiedPP.jpg&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; FATHER SARDUCCI REVEALS THE ACTUAL SIZE BEFORE ED&#39;S ACCIDENT &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.fathersarducci.com/images/sarduccioval.gif&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; ============================== = &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH, SOFT ORGANS &lt;br&gt; -- SOME HUMAN -- FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/1b654762fefde559/894f67ab8c60af91?show_docid=894f67ab8c60af91</guid>
  <author>
  up_yours...@hotmail.com
  (Ed)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:51:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>First Proof Gorillas Eat Monkeys?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0d8683ad8d1c16c4/79eb69562540b8a9?show_docid=79eb69562540b8a9</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/03/100305-first-proof-gorillas-eat-monkeys-mammals-feces-dna/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; First Proof Gorillas Eat Monkeys? &lt;br&gt; Mammal DNA in gorilla feces hints the big apes might eat meat after all. &lt;br&gt; ... &lt;br&gt; But a recent study found DNA from monkeys and small forest antelopes called &lt;br&gt; duikers in the feces of wild African mountain gorillas in Loango National
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/0d8683ad8d1c16c4/79eb69562540b8a9?show_docid=79eb69562540b8a9</guid>
  <author>
  trarve...@hotmmoveail.com
  (RichTravsky)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:47:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Arboreality has allowed for the evolution of increased longevity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/ca66cc88aaea5f8e/27b27a7135b8c0e6?show_docid=27b27a7135b8c0e6</link>
  <description>
  Arboreality has allowed for the evolution of increased longevity in mammals &lt;br&gt; MR. Shattuck, SA Williams 2010 PNAS 107:4635-9 &lt;br&gt; The evolutionary theory of aging predicts that spp will experience delayed &lt;br&gt; senescence &amp;amp; increased longevity when rates of extrinsic mortality are &lt;br&gt; reduced. &lt;br&gt; It has long been recognized that birds &amp;amp; bats are characterized by lower
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/ca66cc88aaea5f8e/27b27a7135b8c0e6?show_docid=27b27a7135b8c0e6</guid>
  <author>
  m_verhae...@skynet.be
  (Marc Verhaegen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:43:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Amphibian Generalist Theory</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/f367ff4950d151bc/94649bbb0f84e541?show_docid=94649bbb0f84e541</link>
  <description>
  False premise. &lt;br&gt; False statement. Standard AAH savannah straw man argument. &lt;br&gt; Not it isn&#39;t, it&#39;s the same discredited guff as Algis tries to &lt;br&gt; promote. It has been clearly established that wading in shallow water &lt;br&gt; does not force bipedal wading. &lt;br&gt; * See for example Hohmann and Fruth, Current Anthropology, Volume 44,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lk/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/browse_thread/thread/f367ff4950d151bc/94649bbb0f84e541?show_docid=94649bbb0f84e541</guid>
  <author>
  rmacf...@alphalink.com.au
  (rmacfarl)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:30:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
